01 May Book Review of The Anatomy of Story: 22 Steps to Becoming a Master Sto…
Exploring The Anatomy of Story: A Provocative Take on Storytelling
As a lifelong lover of stories in all their forms, I was drawn to John Truby’s The Anatomy of Story: 22 Steps to Becoming a Master Storyteller with a mix of anticipation and curiosity. The promise of unlocking the secrets to successful storytelling had me eager to dive in, but I soon found myself wrestling with my expectations versus the content presented.
At its core, Truby’s manual is a deep exploration into story structure, and his 22-step process is designed to guide writers through the intricate landscape of narrative creation. However, I couldn’t help but feel that the journey he outlines is more convoluted than enlightening. From the outset, I found his dismissal of traditional terms like "rising action" and "climax" jarring, as these concepts have served as invaluable tools for countless writers—myself included. When Truby claims they are “almost meaningless,” I couldn’t help but feel a pang of frustration; they are, to many, the bedrock of understanding how to construct a compelling narrative.
What struck me as particularly puzzling was his critique of the three-act structure, which he deemed "meaningless" and "amateur." Instead, Truby advocates for a more rigid, complex system that felt like a double-edged sword. While I appreciate the intent to innovate, the result seems to lean toward an over-engineered formula that could limit creativity rather than inspire it.
Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of Truby’s work is his concept of the "designing principle." He claims it leads to “original and organic” storytelling, yet fails to delineate this principle clearly. It felt like being teased with the promise of something significant that was never fully realized. I wanted—no, needed—to grasp what this foundational concept truly meant in the context of storytelling, but instead found myself tangled in vague definitions.
Additionally, I was particularly irked by his sweeping generalizations about genres, especially regarding the treatment of Westerns. His assertion that the Western genre is largely about "conquering the land and transforming ‘barbarian’ races" overlooks the rich complexities of stories like The Magnificent Seven or Once Upon a Time in the West. Instead of touching on the nuanced themes of good versus evil, or man’s struggles within society, Truby’s conclusions came across as overly simplistic and politically charged—misrepresentations that left me scratching my head.
For writers who dutifully gather advice from every corner of the literary world, this book might hold some value, but I would caution against entering with sky-high expectations. It serves as a spark for thought rather than a definitive roadmap.
Overall, I would recommend The Anatomy of Story to aspiring screenwriters looking to sharpen their tools, but perhaps not for novelists hoping to capture the essence of narrative in a flowing, organic manner. While it may not be my go-to guide for storytelling, Truby’s book certainly provoked a rich dialogue about the choices we make as storytellers. It left me contemplating the relationship between structure and creativity, reminding me that every journey in writing is unique and demands a personalized approach.
In the end, my experience with this book might not have been what I had hoped, but it was certainly an intriguing detour in my ongoing exploration of storytelling. Whether you agree or disagree with Truby, one thing remains clear: storytelling will always spark conversations worth having.
Discover more about The Anatomy of Story: 22 Steps to Becoming a Master Sto… on GoodReads >>
